
Wednesday, Oct 21, 5:30 PM CDT
Chicago Debate Showcase.
Get better at making your point, handling pushback, and understanding the other side, so when an argument matters, you're ready for it.Practice making your point, handling pushback, and understanding the other side.

Wednesday, Oct 21, 5:30 PM CDT
Chicago DebateShowcase.

20-minute course
Five lessons, worked examples and a first exercise. Start without an account.
Try your first exercise
Community & expert appearances
Join a community round or prepare a featured debate around your expertise.
See how to participate
Event, city & founding packages
See confirmed event details, recognition options and what each package covers.
See packages and pricesSee the next Chicago and Boston showcases, explore the speakers and questions, or watch a complete debate now.

Live · In person
The Ferris, 1 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL
Three live debates about artificial intelligence, audience voting and a closing reception.
Topics: intellectual property and healthcare. Third debate to be announced.
View program & tickets
Live · In person
Boston, MA — venue to be announced
Debates about artificial intelligence, audience questions and a reception in Boston.
View program & tickets
Live · In person
The Ferris, 1 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL
The Chicago series continues with new questions and speakers.
View program & ticketsResolved: When AI contributes creativity equivalent to that of a joint author or joint inventor, the resulting work or invention should not receive patent or copyright protection.

Jordana R. Goodman
Assistant Professor, Chicago-Kent College of Law; Innovator in Residence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Joshua D. Sarnoff
Raymond P. Niro Professor of Intellectual Property Law, DePaul University College of Law
How much human involvement should consequential AI actions in healthcare require?

Maia Jacobs
Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University

Manling Li
Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Kuruganti Junior Faculty Fellow, Northwestern University
To be recorded online. Public release dates to be announced.
Recording · October 12, 2026

Martin Ford
Futurist; bestselling author of Rise of the Robots.
Affirmative
Pedro Domingos
UW professor emeritus; author of The Master Algorithm.
NegativeRecording · October 22, 2026

Garett Jones
Professor of Economics, George Mason University; author of 10% Less Democracy.
Affirmative
Anthony Fowler
Sydney A. Stein Jr. Professor, University of Chicago Harris School.
NegativeFree to watch. No account needed.
All recordings

Full recording · 35 min
Iain Lampert vs. Lindsay Duede
Watch the debate

Full recording · 36 min
Wilfred Reilly vs. Armand Domalewski
Watch the debate

Full recording · 41 min
Scott Santens vs. Malcolm Collins
Watch the debateEach speaker makes the strongest case for the other’s view, then explores what could change their own.

Local clubs
Meet people who enjoy testing ideas. Watch a round, take a side when you’re ready, and stay for the conversation afterward.
Find a club near you and check its next meeting and host before you go.
Find a clubFirst-timers welcome.
A moderator keeps each round moving. Join as a speaker or follow the exchange from the audience.
See timing and full rules →
Argue for or against one clear resolution, even when it is not the position you walked in believing.
Each side gets equal, uninterrupted time to explain its reasoning and put forward evidence.
Question your opponent’s reasoning, then respond to the strongest objections to your own case.
Audience persuasion scores reflect what convinces the room. They do not establish factual truth.
Live video
Choose a topic, take a side and invite an opponent. SuperDebate keeps time and lets the audience score the exchange.
Sign in when you start the room.
1 on 1
You vs one
2 on 2
Teams
Relay
Rotating
Pro
Argue for
Con
Argue against
Short
~4 min
Standard
~10 min
Long
~20 min
Choose your topic, format and speaking time.

Preview of a 1-on-1 debate room.
Aurelius · AI practice
Debate an AI opponent, work through its objections, and get specific feedback on your reasoning. Practice at your own pace before you take the floor.
The sample is open to everyone. Sign in to start your own session.

You’re making the case for a shorter week.
A four-day week would give people more time to rest without cutting their pay.
Would the same work fit into fewer days, or would people simply work longer shifts?
Define the hours, explain which work you would change, and say how you would test the result.

Learn the craft, meet your local club, or bring your expertise to the stage. There’s a place for you in the conversation.