SHOULD RACE-CONSCIOUS COLLEGE ADMISSIONS BE RESTORED?
General · Real arguments from SuperDebate members below
Both sides of the argument
The case for
Research from Patricia Gurin at the University of Michigan found that students who attend diverse colleges show greater civic engagement, stronger ability to work in diverse environments, and better problem-solving skills. The educational benefit accrues to all students, not only underrepresented...
Posted by jconnor
The achievement gap between Black and white students is a documented product of 80 years of explicitly race-based federal housing and education policy: redlining, school segregation, GI Bill exclusion. Using race-neutral admissions to fix a race-created problem is not neutral; it is a deliberate...
Posted by jconnor
California banned affirmative action in 1996. By 2006, Black enrollment at UCLA Law School had fallen by 80 percent. A generation of qualified students was diverted to less prestigious schools, and the pipeline to the state's legal and political leadership narrowed dramatically. The real-world...
Posted by jconnor
The case against
The Fourteenth Amendment's equal-protection clause applies to individuals, not demographic groups. Admissions officers make decisions about individual applicants, and using race as a factor in those decisions is a racial classification. The Supreme Court has now confirmed this interpretation twice,...
Posted by jconnor
Race-conscious admissions at elite schools have been most harmful to Asian American applicants, who faced documented caps and lower effective evaluation standards than other groups at Harvard and other selective schools. Correcting one historical injustice by creating another is not a principled...
Posted by jconnor
Race-conscious admissions at 50 elite schools are a downstream fix for an upstream problem. The real inequality is in K-12 education funding, early childhood development, and housing access. Investing there helps millions of students; adjusting 50,000 admissions decisions at flagship universities...
Posted by jconnor
Argue it yourself
Rehearse it
Debate this exact resolution against the AI coach and get scored feedback.
Practice with the coachFrequently asked questions
What is a strong argument for "Should Race-Conscious College Admissions Be Restored?"?
Research from Patricia Gurin at the University of Michigan found that students who attend diverse colleges show greater civic engagement, stronger ability to work in diverse environments, and better problem-solving skills. The educational benefit accrues to all students, not only underrepresented... (Argued by jconnor on SuperDebate.)
What is a strong argument against "Should Race-Conscious College Admissions Be Restored?"?
The Fourteenth Amendment's equal-protection clause applies to individuals, not demographic groups. Admissions officers make decisions about individual applicants, and using race as a factor in those decisions is a racial classification. The Supreme Court has now confirmed this interpretation twice,... (Argued by jconnor on SuperDebate.)
Has "Should Race-Conscious College Admissions Be Restored?" been debated live?
Not yet. Anyone can take a side on the topic page and challenge an opponent to argue it live on SuperDebate.
Where can I debate "Should Race-Conscious College Admissions Be Restored?"?
On SuperDebate. Post a written argument on the topic page, rehearse the resolution against the AI debate coach, or take it to a live debate night at a club near you. Joining is free.