The accessible alternative to values-based 1v1 debate
Lincoln-Douglas (LD) debate is a values-based 1v1 format named after the historic 1858 Lincoln-Douglas senatorial debates. It's the primary individual debate format in American high school competition, governed by the National Speech & Debate Association (NSDA).
LD requires debaters to establish a value (like justice, liberty, or equality) and a criterion (the framework for weighing arguments toward that value). Topics rotate bi-monthly, and competitive LD often involves pre-written cases and rapid delivery.
SuperDebate was created for those who love philosophical debate but want accessibility - no mandatory frameworks, no age restrictions, no months of case preparation.
Build and present your original arguments. Make your case clearly and persuasively.
Question your opponent. Clarify positions and expose weaknesses in their arguments.
Respond to your opponent's arguments and reinforce your own. Deliver your closing.
That's it. Three speech types, infinitely configurable. From Quick 18-minute rounds to In-Depth 60-minute debates.
| Feature | SuperDebate | Lincoln-Douglas (LD) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | 1v1 to 5v5 (flexible) | 1v1 only (fixed) |
| Duration | 18-60 min (4 presets) | ~45 min (fixed 32 min speaking + prep) |
| Preparation | No advance prep. Topics at the event. | Extensive case writing required |
| Framework | No required framework | Value + Criterion structure mandatory |
| Topic Cycle | Fresh topics each event | Same topic for 2 months |
| Age/Status | Open to all ages | Primarily high school (NSDA) |
| Speaking Style | Natural, conversational | Often includes spreading at competitive levels |
| Learning Curve | Minimal - start immediately | Steep - months to master framework |
| Judging | Clear universal criteria | Varies by judge paradigm (traditional/progressive) |
| Cost | Free or minimal | Circuit fees, coaching, debate camps |
Skip the value premise and criterion structure. Make arguments directly without mandatory philosophical scaffolding.
Not locked into 1v1. Choose solo, 2v2, or team formats up to 5v5 based on your preference.
No weeks of writing affirmative and negative cases. Topics assigned at the event - compete on quick thinking.
Not just high school students. Adults, professionals, and anyone can compete without age restrictions.
No spreading expected. Debate at conversational pace that audiences can follow and enjoy.
Argue about ethics and values on your own terms. Philosophy is welcome but not structurally mandatory.
No framework required. No case prep needed. Just show up and debate.
