Find a question, read both sides and choose how to join the discussion.
The lean meter combines side votes, written arguments and video takes. It shows participation on each side, not a debate result.
10 topics match your filters
Rehabilitation-focused systems in Nordic countries have lower recidivism rates, save taxpayer money, and address root causes of crime. However, critics argue it may fail to deliver justice for victims, could be seen as "soft on crime," and some offenders may be beyond rehabilitation.
Holding parents accountable could incentivize better supervision, ensure victims receive compensation, and acknowledge parental influence on behavior. However, it may be unfair to parents who tried their best, could disproportionately affect struggling families, and ignores that children are autonomous individuals.
When one company buys another company for cash, the shareholders of the company being purchased give up their shares in exchange for money. However, there can be a period between the completion of the deal and when shareholders actually receive their money. Many merger agreements provide that shareholders will not receive interest during this period. Should shareholders be paid interest for the time they are waiting to receive their money, or is the current practice fair?
