DO ANIMALS HAVE MORAL RIGHTS THAT HUMANS MUST RESPECT?
General · Real arguments from SuperDebate members below
Both sides of the argument
The case for
The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, signed by prominent neuroscientists in 2012, affirmed that mammals, birds, and fish possess the neurological structures associated with conscious experience. Consciousness is the basis on which we extend moral consideration to other humans; the scientific...
Posted by jconnor
We already acknowledge that animal suffering matters: every US state has anti-cruelty laws covering dogs, cats, and horses. Factory farming applies conditions to pigs and chickens — gestation crates, battery cages, debeaking — that would be federal felonies under the Animal Welfare Act if applied...
Posted by jconnor
The utilitarian case is simple: if a pig can suffer, and we cause it to suffer for the momentary pleasure of a meal we could replace with another, we are causing substantial suffering for a trivial reason. That calculus requires only the capacity for pain, which the science confirms pigs possess —...
Posted by jconnor
The case against
Rights, in the philosophical tradition from which the concept derives, imply duties. An entity with rights must also bear responsibilities toward others in the moral community. Animals cannot honor contracts, exercise restraint, or be held accountable for their actions toward other beings. Granting...
Posted by jconnor
The animal rights argument, taken to its logical conclusion, applies to insects, which are sentient by most empirical definitions used by the pro side. There are an estimated 10 quintillion insects on Earth; farming, construction, and walking outside kills millions per person per year. The argument...
Posted by jconnor
The appropriate policy framework is welfare, not rights. We can significantly reduce animal suffering in factory farming through regulation without granting animals a legal status that would prohibit all use of animals in medicine, agriculture, and research. Welfare and rights are distinct policy...
Posted by jconnor
Argue it yourself
Rehearse it
Debate this exact resolution against the AI coach and get scored feedback.
Practice with the coachFrequently asked questions
What is a strong argument for "Do Animals Have Moral Rights That Humans Must Respect?"?
The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, signed by prominent neuroscientists in 2012, affirmed that mammals, birds, and fish possess the neurological structures associated with conscious experience. Consciousness is the basis on which we extend moral consideration to other humans; the scientific... (Argued by jconnor on SuperDebate.)
What is a strong argument against "Do Animals Have Moral Rights That Humans Must Respect?"?
Rights, in the philosophical tradition from which the concept derives, imply duties. An entity with rights must also bear responsibilities toward others in the moral community. Animals cannot honor contracts, exercise restraint, or be held accountable for their actions toward other beings. Granting... (Argued by jconnor on SuperDebate.)
Has "Do Animals Have Moral Rights That Humans Must Respect?" been debated live?
Not yet. Anyone can take a side on the topic page and challenge an opponent to argue it live on SuperDebate.
Where can I debate "Do Animals Have Moral Rights That Humans Must Respect?"?
On SuperDebate. Post a written argument on the topic page, rehearse the resolution against the AI debate coach, or take it to a live debate night at a club near you. Joining is free.