SHOULD THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE BE ABOLISHED?
General · Real arguments from SuperDebate members below
Both sides of the argument
The case for
The Electoral College was designed partly to give slave states outsized influence by counting enslaved people as 3/5 of a person toward electoral votes. The winner-take-all allocation used by 48 states has no constitutional basis and was not intended by the founders — it was adopted state by state...
Posted by jconnor
The concentration of presidential campaigns in 5-7 swing states means the remaining 40+ states are effectively ignored. Policies, spending, and candidate attention flow to Pennsylvania and Arizona while Texas and California voters are taken for granted. A national popular vote would make every vote...
Posted by jconnor
Every other major democracy with a directly elected executive uses a national popular vote. The US could adopt ranked-choice voting to handle third-party spoiler dynamics while achieving genuine majority legitimacy. The American system is the global outlier, not the model.
Posted by jconnor
The case against
The Electoral College forces candidates to assemble broad geographic coalitions. A national popular vote would concentrate the entire election in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston, allowing candidates to ignore the 40 states they can't run up the score in — the opposite of the...
Posted by jconnor
The 2000 and 2016 outcomes that offend reform advocates were legitimate under the rules both candidates competed under. Changing electoral rules in response to a disliked outcome is corrosive to the democratic norm that you play by the rules even when you lose — and signals that the rules should...
Posted by jconnor
The National Popular Vote Compact raises serious constitutional questions under the Compact Clause and could allow a small group of compact-state legislatures to override election results in non-compact states. That's not reform; it's a constitutional crisis written in advance.
Posted by jconnor
Argue it yourself
Rehearse it
Debate this exact resolution against the AI coach and get scored feedback.
Practice with the coachFrequently asked questions
What is a strong argument for "Should the Electoral College Be Abolished?"?
The Electoral College was designed partly to give slave states outsized influence by counting enslaved people as 3/5 of a person toward electoral votes. The winner-take-all allocation used by 48 states has no constitutional basis and was not intended by the founders — it was adopted state by state... (Argued by jconnor on SuperDebate.)
What is a strong argument against "Should the Electoral College Be Abolished?"?
The Electoral College forces candidates to assemble broad geographic coalitions. A national popular vote would concentrate the entire election in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston, allowing candidates to ignore the 40 states they can't run up the score in — the opposite of the... (Argued by jconnor on SuperDebate.)
Has "Should the Electoral College Be Abolished?" been debated live?
Not yet. Anyone can take a side on the topic page and challenge an opponent to argue it live on SuperDebate.
Where can I debate "Should the Electoral College Be Abolished?"?
On SuperDebate. Post a written argument on the topic page, rehearse the resolution against the AI debate coach, or take it to a live debate night at a club near you. Joining is free.