SHOULD THE US ADOPT RANKED-CHOICE VOTING?
Should the US Adopt Ranked-Choice Voting?
Politics & Government · Real arguments from SuperDebate members below
Both sides of the argument
The case for
The spoiler effect — where a third-party candidate splits the vote with the ideologically closer major-party candidate and elects the one both disliked most — is a structural defect in plurality voting. Ralph Nader in 2000, Ross Perot in 1992, and dozens of state-level races show this. RCV...
Posted by jconnor
Alaska adopted RCV in 2022 and elected Mary Peltola, ending 50 years of Republican dominance in its House seat. Post-election surveys showed voters understood the system and approval of the process was high. The claim that RCV confuses voters is not supported by the evidence from jurisdictions that...
Posted by jconnor
RCV forces candidates to build broader coalitions — you need to be the second choice of your opponents' voters to survive. That structural incentive rewards candidates who run issue-focused, less negative campaigns. Studies of Australian elections (which have used RCV nationally since 1918) show...
Posted by jconnor
The case against
RCV violates majority rule: the Condorcet paradox shows that in certain vote distributions, it's possible to elect a candidate who would lose head-to-head against any individual opponent. "Exhausted ballots" — where a voter's rankings are all eliminated before the final round — mean not all voters...
Posted by jconnor
New York City's 2021 mayoral primary under RCV saw weeks of counting, multiple erroneous results, and a final outcome that differed from initial results — creating widespread public confusion about who won. Election administrators in smaller counties lack the software and training to run RCV...
Posted by jconnor
The spoiler effect is overblown: strong third-party candidates appear in only a fraction of elections, and the solution — ballot access reform, open primaries — can be achieved without the complexity of RCV. Approval voting achieves most of the anti-spoiler benefit with much simpler ballot...
Posted by jconnor
Argue it yourself
Rehearse it
Debate this exact resolution against the AI coach and get scored feedback.
Practice with the coachFrequently asked questions
What is a strong argument for "Should the US Adopt Ranked-Choice Voting?"?
The spoiler effect — where a third-party candidate splits the vote with the ideologically closer major-party candidate and elects the one both disliked most — is a structural defect in plurality voting. Ralph Nader in 2000, Ross Perot in 1992, and dozens of state-level races show this. RCV... (Argued by jconnor on SuperDebate.)
What is a strong argument against "Should the US Adopt Ranked-Choice Voting?"?
RCV violates majority rule: the Condorcet paradox shows that in certain vote distributions, it's possible to elect a candidate who would lose head-to-head against any individual opponent. "Exhausted ballots" — where a voter's rankings are all eliminated before the final round — mean not all voters... (Argued by jconnor on SuperDebate.)
Has "Should the US Adopt Ranked-Choice Voting?" been debated live?
Not yet. Anyone can take a side on the topic page and challenge an opponent to argue it live on SuperDebate.
Where can I debate "Should the US Adopt Ranked-Choice Voting?"?
On SuperDebate. Post a written argument on the topic page, rehearse the resolution against the AI debate coach, or take it to a live debate night at a club near you. Joining is free.