Opening event
Loading the latest details…
Capitalism lifted a billion people from poverty between 1990 and 2015. The world's billionaires now hold more wealth than the bottom 60% of humanity. Has it outlived its usefulness — or is there no better alternative? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.
Monday, September 21, 2026 · 7:00 PM EDT
What's at stake
If capitalism has outlived its usefulness, what replaces it is the urgent question. If it hasn't, conflating reform with replacement produces worse outcomes on both fronts.
The Matchup
Debater: To be announced
Debater: To be announced
Join the debate
Record a 60-second video on either side, or make it in writing. The strongest cases get featured before the live debate.
“Global extreme poverty fell from 90% in 1820 to under 10% today, driven overwhelmingly by market economies integrating into global trade. No other economic system produced anything like it — not central planning, not autarky, not command economies. The burden of proof is on capitalism's critics to name an alternative with a comparable track record.”
“Capitalism's famous failures — monopoly, externalities, boom-bust cycles — are arguments for specific interventions: antitrust, carbon pricing, financial regulation. They are not arguments against markets themselves. The alternative is not some perfectly designed alternative but something demonstrably worse, as the 20th century repeatedly demonstrated.”
“Capitalism has a structural incompatibility with the climate crisis. It externalizes costs onto the future and the poor, and no amount of green capitalism has produced the emissions reductions the physics requires. The market cannot price catastrophic risk it has no incentive to price; that is not a market failure to be corrected — it is a structural feature.”
“Democratic institutions designed to tame capitalism are being captured by it. Regulatory agencies are staffed by the industries they regulate; campaigns are funded by the interests they constrain; and billionaires own the media that sets the terms of debate. A system that systematically undermines its own constraints is not self-correcting — it is self-entrenching.”
The Format
Standard SuperDebate: two people, cross-examination, moderated from start to finish.
4 min · PRO · opening case
4 min · CON questions PRO
4 min · CON · opening case
4 min · PRO questions CON
3 min · PRO
3 min · CON
3 min · PRO · final case
3 min · CON · final case
— · You pick the winner
Don't miss it
The debate happens live with real-time audience voting. Get one email right before we go live, with the watch link.
Premieres
Monday, September 21, 2026 · 7:00 PM EDT
Open debate runs on the people who show up. Tell us how you want to be part of it.
Structured debates on the ideas that matter most. You score who makes the stronger case.
Humanity uses 1.7 Earths yearly. Degrowth economists say rich nations must shrink; others say technology can decouple growth from harm. Can the planet survive endless growth — or is degrowth a recipe for poverty? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.
Aging kills 100,000 people every day — more than cancer and war combined. Google's Calico has invested billions in life-extension research. Should we treat aging as a disease — or accept it as part of a meaningful life? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.
The US has spent over $1 trillion on the drug war since 1971 — overdoses still hit 107,000 in 2023. Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001 and saw deaths plummet. Does legalization fix it — or abandon the most vulnerable? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.
South Korea's birth rate hit 0.72 in 2023 — a record low. Japan and Hungary pay tens of thousands per child; birthrates keep falling. Is population collapse a civilizational crisis — or a feature of modernity and freedom? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.