Opening event
Loading the latest details…
The EU banned new gas vehicle sales by 2035; California matched it. Norway leads with over 90% EV market share. Does a hard deadline accelerate the inevitable — or burden rural and working-class Americans unfairly? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.
Thursday, December 3, 2026 · 7:00 PM EST
What's at stake
A 2035 ban either pushes the clean-energy transition past its tipping point or becomes the defining example of democracies failing to impose necessary collective sacrifice.
The Matchup
Debater: To be announced
Debater: To be announced
Join the debate
Record a 60-second video on either side, or make it in writing. The strongest cases get featured before the live debate.
“Transportation accounts for roughly 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and new vehicles sold today will still be on the road in 2045. A 2035 ban on new gas vehicle sales does not remove any existing car; it shapes the fleet that will dominate emissions in the 2040s and 2050s — exactly the decade when the remaining carbon budget closes.”
“Battery costs have fallen from $1,100 per kilowatt-hour in 2010 to under $100 in 2024, a 90% reduction in 14 years. At current trajectories, EVs will be cheaper to purchase and operate than gas vehicles by 2030 without any mandate. The ban does not force consumers to buy more expensive cars; it aligns the regulatory endpoint with a market transition already underway.”
“The average EV price in 2024 remains above $50,000, and the federal tax credit reaches fewer than half of buyers due to income caps and vehicle price limits. Rural Americans drive longer distances, cannot charge at home in rented apartments, and live far from public charging networks. A mandate that works for urban professionals is effectively a prohibition on affordable transportation for everyone else.”
“Mining the lithium, cobalt, and manganese required for EV batteries produces significant environmental harm in Chile, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Indonesia — water table destruction, worker exploitation, community displacement. Replacing tailpipe emissions with mining emissions in other countries does not solve the global problem; it relocates it.”
The Format
Standard SuperDebate: two people, cross-examination, moderated from start to finish.
4 min · PRO · opening case
4 min · CON questions PRO
4 min · CON · opening case
4 min · PRO questions CON
3 min · PRO
3 min · CON
3 min · PRO · final case
3 min · CON · final case
— · You pick the winner
Don't miss it
The debate happens live with real-time audience voting. Get one email right before we go live, with the watch link.
Premieres
Thursday, December 3, 2026 · 7:00 PM EST
Open debate runs on the people who show up. Tell us how you want to be part of it.
Structured debates on the ideas that matter most. You score who makes the stronger case.
Humanity uses 1.7 Earths yearly. Degrowth economists say rich nations must shrink; others say technology can decouple growth from harm. Can the planet survive endless growth — or is degrowth a recipe for poverty? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.
Aging kills 100,000 people every day — more than cancer and war combined. Google's Calico has invested billions in life-extension research. Should we treat aging as a disease — or accept it as part of a meaningful life? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.
The US has spent over $1 trillion on the drug war since 1971 — overdoses still hit 107,000 in 2023. Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001 and saw deaths plummet. Does legalization fix it — or abandon the most vulnerable? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.
South Korea's birth rate hit 0.72 in 2023 — a record low. Japan and Hungary pay tens of thousands per child; birthrates keep falling. Is population collapse a civilizational crisis — or a feature of modernity and freedom? Two debaters, opposing sides — you score who makes the stronger case.