Pick a topic and share your 60-second video take. Vote, argue the other side, and go live
The lean meter combines side votes, written arguments, and video takes. It shows participation on each side, not a debate result.
20 topics match your filters
Universal healthcare ensures all citizens receive medical care regardless of income, reduces overall costs through prevention, and improves population health. However, it requires high taxes, may reduce quality and innovation, and could lead to longer wait times.
Five years after the pandemic, we must evaluate whether public health leaders were unprepared, provided inconsistent guidance, and violated civil liberties through mandates. Or did society fail public health by ignoring expert advice, politicizing science, and spreading misinformation?
Advocates argue that platforms knowingly design addictive features targeting adolescents, contributing to teen mental health crises, and should face liability like tobacco companies. Tech defenders maintain that correlation does not prove causation, that underlying social factors drive mental health issues, and that censorship and liability would destroy beneficial platforms.
Harm reduction advocates argue that overdose deaths require treating addiction as a medical condition through expanded access to medication-assisted treatment and safe consumption sites. Law-and-order proponents counter that tough enforcement, interdiction, and accountability—not enabling use through treatment—are needed to end the crisis.
Public health advocates argue that ultra-processed foods constitute a large portion of modern diets, drive chronic disease epidemics, and require aggressive regulation including warning labels and marketing restrictions. Industry defenders counter that personal choice should prevail, that food regulation is paternalistic, and that affordability and convenience make processed foods necessary for working families.
Mandatory vaccination protects vulnerable populations through herd immunity, prevents disease outbreaks, and has been proven safe and effective. However, it may violate parental rights, medical autonomy, and religious freedom. Should exemptions be allowed?
Recognizing mental health days would reduce stigma, prevent burnout, improve productivity, and acknowledge that mental health is as important as physical health. However, concerns include potential abuse, difficulty verifying need, and the challenge of distinguishing genuine mental health needs from wanting a day off.
One view holds that time alone is necessary for self-reflection, creativity, and developing a strong sense of self independent of others' influences. The opposing perspective argues that growth happens primarily through relationships, dialogue, and seeing ourselves reflected in others' responses.
Advocates note that sleep deprivation affects tens of millions, causes massive productivity losses, and contributes to leading causes of death—making it an urgent addressable health crisis. Skeptics argue other factors like diet, exercise, and healthcare access have larger health impacts, and that personal sleep choices should not be medicalized or regulated.
Some argue that as distractions multiply, the ability to concentrate deeply becomes increasingly rare and valuable, giving focused individuals competitive advantage. Others contend this view romanticizes difficulty—that multitasking and rapid context-switching are adaptive modern skills, and nostalgia for sustained focus is misplaced.
